<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Roboethics(Robot Ethics) Info Database &#187; Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/tag/safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics</link>
	<description>Roboethics(Robot Ethics) Info Database: A Place to Talk about the Newest Technologies and the Ethical Issues Behind Them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Six ways to build robots that do humans no harm &#8211; tech &#8211; 18 November 2008 &#8211; New Scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/03/six-ways-to-build-robots-that-do-humans-no-harm-tech-18-november-2008-new-scientist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/03/six-ways-to-build-robots-that-do-humans-no-harm-tech-18-november-2008-new-scientist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AJung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News&Mag Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/?p=1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six ways to build robots that do humans no harm &#8211; tech &#8211; 18 November 2008 &#8211; New Scientist.
I am not sure why this article slipped through my radar. But this article from New Scientist is a somewhat humorous listing of six ways we could build robots that do humans no harm.
It mentions the authors of the book &#8216;Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong&#8217;. Although this article is not a comprehensive summary of the book, it is a fun read for those of you who may have contemplated the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/03/six-ways-to-build-robots-that-do-humans-no-harm-tech-18-november-2008-new-scientist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety issues loom as humanoid invasion approaches &#8211; tech &#8211; 10 March 2010 &#8211; New Scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/03/safety-issues-loom-as-humanoid-invasion-approaches-tech-10-march-2010-new-scientist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/03/safety-issues-loom-as-humanoid-invasion-approaches-tech-10-march-2010-new-scientist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AJung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News&Mag Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Safety issues loom as humanoid invasion approaches &#8211; tech &#8211; 10 March 2010 &#8211; New Scientist.
More and more people are asking the question &#8216;how can we make it safe to hang out with robots in our daily life?&#8217;
In the New Scientist article, Chris Melhuish looks at how facial expressions of a humanoid can be used to make the humanoids intentions more transparent to human users, so that we would know what to expect from the robot.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/03/safety-issues-loom-as-humanoid-invasion-approaches-tech-10-march-2010-new-scientist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robotics Safety Standards, ISO 10218 &#8211; A White Paper by Rockwell Automation</title>
		<link>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/02/robotics-safety-standards-iso-10218-a-white-paper-by-rockwell-automation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/02/robotics-safety-standards-iso-10218-a-white-paper-by-rockwell-automation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AJung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roboethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/?p=1045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m going to switch gears today and talk about industrial automation.
Last December, Rockwell Automation – one of the leading companies in industrial automation – released a white paper entitled “International Safety Standards Keep Pace with Advances in Robotic Technology and Applications”. This paper talks about the current robotics safety standard (ISO 10218-1 and ANSI/RIA R15.06), and the new standard (part 2 of ISO 10218, or ISO 10218-2) being drafted for release in 2011.
With a brief overview of history of robots, the paper talks about how ANSI/RIA R.15.06 adopted in 1999 ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amoon.ca/Roboethics/2010/02/robotics-safety-standards-iso-10218-a-white-paper-by-rockwell-automation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

