Human-Robot Interaction

The way robots interact with us and related issues

Health Care Robots

Latest news on health care robots and related issues

Military Robots

Latest news on military robots, autonomous and tele-operated systems

Robots in the Wild

Catch-all category covering robots for your home to those still hanging out at labs

Commentary

Commentaries by AJung on anything and everything robots/roboethics

Home » Archive by Tags

Articles tagged with: Psychology

The Empathic Civilisation and Roboethics

September 2, 2010 – 12:43 pm | 161 views

I am becoming quite fond of RSA animations, and they are becoming more of my idea tinkering entertainment sources during dinner. If any of the roboethicists out there are a fan of either TED videos …

CFP: 9th International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL)

March 4, 2010 – 3:24 am | One Comment | 38 views

ICDL is the premiere venue for interdisciplinary research that blends
the boundaries between robotics, artificial intelligence, machine
learning, developmental psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy. The 9th International Conference on Development and Learning will be held on August 18-21, 2010.

Peter H. Kahn, Jr. – Psychologist in the Field

November 28, 2009 – 4:24 pm | 50 views

Previous post on Interaction Studies journal, and helpful nudges from my friends led me to an article from the journal titled “What is human? – Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction”. The paper itself is as interesting as the title. The first author of this paper is Peter Kahn, who is introduced in this post…

What is a human? – toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction

November 28, 2009 – 4:14 pm | 0 views

This paper argues that psychological questions are as important as ontological questions related to human-like robot development. Nine psychological benchmarks to measure success of human-likeness of a robot is introduced: autonomy, imitation, intrinsic moral value, moral accountability, privacy, reciprocity, conventionality, creativity, and authenticity of relation. Argues that there are strong and weak ontological and psychological claims, combination of which result in four different future cases of how humans will perceive/accept robots and what robots will have become.
Here, the authors define ‘psychological benchmark’ as “categories of interaction that capture conceptually fundamental aspects of human life, specified abstractly enough to resist their identity as a mere psychological instrument, but capable of being translated into testable empirical
propositions”. Later, they argue that “in investigating who we are as a species, and who we can become, we need not privilege the biological “platform”.” Also included is an ambitious claim that “we seek to put into play the entirety of human psychology, extending not only into the realms of sociality but also morality.”